Rimonabant
Also known asAcomplia · Zimulti · rimonabantum · A08AX01 · Rimonabant free base · Rimoslim · C22H21Cl3N4O · Acomplia (TN)
5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-N-piperidin-1-ylpyrazole-3-carboxamide
I · Summary
What is known
Published passages, each quoted whole and attributed to the database that published it. Two blocks are written here rather than quoted, and both say so where they stand: the synthesized summary at the top, which may draw only on the passages beneath it, and the history note, which cites the works it came from. Every claim in either carries a marker to its source.
What it is
Rimonabant is a carbohydrazide obtained by formal condensation of the carboxy group of 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid with the amino group of 1-aminopiperidine. It is a potent and selective cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) antagonist. Besides its antagonistic properties, numerous studies have shown that, at micromolar concentrations rimonabant behaves as an inverse agonist at CB1 receptors. The drug was the first selective CB1 antagonist/inverse agonist introduced into clinical practice to treat obesity and metabolic-related disorders. It was later withdrawn from market due to CNS-related adverse effects including depression and suicidal ideatio…
Rimonabant is an anorectic anti-obesity drug produced and marketed by Sanofi-Aventis. It is an inverse agonist for the cannabinoid receptor CB1. Its main avenue of effect is reduction in appetite. Rimonabant is the first selective CB1 receptor blocker to be approved for use anywhere in the world. Rimonabant is approved in 38 countries including the E.U., Mexico, and Brazil. It was rejected for approval for use in the United States. This decision was made after a U.S. advisory panel recommended the medicine not be approved because it may increase suicidal thinking and depression.
A pyrazole and piperidine derivative that acts as a selective cannabinoid type-1 receptor (CB1 RECEPTOR) antagonist. It inhibits the proliferation and maturation of ADIPOCYTES, improves lipid and glucose metabolism, and regulates food intake and energy balance. It is used in the management of OBESITY.
Recognized use
For use in conjunction with diet and exercise for patients with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2, or patients wih a BMI greater than 27 kg/m2 with associated risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes or dyslipidaemia.
How it acts
- Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonistANTAGONISTPMID 16503766PMID 17462824
Rimonabant is a specific CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist. There is considerable evidence that the endocannabinoid (endogenous cannabinoid) system plays a significant role in appetitive drive and associated behaviours. It is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that the attenuation of the activity of this system would have therapeutic benefit in treating disorders that might have a component of excess appetitive drive or over-activity of the endocannabinoid system, such as obesity, ethanol and other drug abuse, and a variety of central nervous system and other disorders.
In the RIO-North America trial, 3040 patients were randomized to receive either placebo or one of two doses of rimonabant (5 mg or 20 mg per day). Patients taking 20 mg rimonabant had significant weigh loss, decrease in waist circumference, improved insulin sensitivity, and increases in HDL cholesterol, compared to patients on placebo.
Behavior carries the pharmacological classes and the acute-effect durations, with plasma half-life kept separate from duration of effect.
History, discovery and cultural use
— Not in this archive. PubChem, ChEMBL and the Human Protein Atlas publish pharmacology, regulation and toxicology, and none of them publishes a heading for when Rimonabant was first made, by whom, or how it has been used. That is a gap in the databases this site reads and not a gap in the literature — the history of these compounds is written, at length and under peer review, in the works below. This site does not summarize them; it says where they are. Where a published passage above happens to touch origin or traditional use, it appears inside the entry that carries it.
Histories of this field
Scholarship on psychedelics generally, not on Rimonabant specifically. Whether any of these treats this compound is a question for the book, not for this page.
Mescaline: A Global History of the First Psychedelic
Traces mescaline and the peyote and San Pedro cacti from pre-Columbian ritual use through nineteenth-century chemistry to twentieth-century psychiatry and the counterculture.
Jay M. Mescaline: A Global History of the First Psychedelic. Yale University Press, New Haven and London; 2019. ISBN 9780300231076.
Expanding Mindscapes: A Global History of Psychedelicsopen access
Essays on the international and cross-cultural history of psychedelic science, deliberately decentring the standard North American and European account.
Dyck E, Elcock C, editors. Expanding Mindscapes: A Global History of Psychedelics. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA; 2023. ISBN 9780262546935 (paper), 9780262376891 (open access). doi:10.7551/mitpress/14417.001.0001.
Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing, and Hallucinogenic Powers
Botany, ethnography and chemistry of the principal hallucinogenic plants, by the founder of modern ethnobotany and the chemist who first synthesized LSD.
Schultes RE, Hofmann A, Rätsch C. Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing, and Hallucinogenic Powers. 2nd ed. Healing Arts Press, Rochester VT; 2001. ISBN 9780892819799.
Psychonauts: Drugs and the Making of the Modern Mind
The tradition of scientific self-experimentation with psychoactive drugs, and its part in the emergence of psychology and of modernism.
Jay M. Psychonauts: Drugs and the Making of the Modern Mind. Yale University Press, New Haven; 2023. ISBN 9780300257946.
Ancient Psychoactive Substances
Archaeological and bioarchaeological evidence for psychoactive plant use across the ancient world.
Fitzpatrick SM, editor. Ancient Psychoactive Substances. University Press of Florida, Gainesville; 2018. ISBN 9780813056708.
A chapter tracing psychedelic and entactogen research from earlier ritual use through the mid-century research period to current clinical trials.
Stroud C, Posey Norris SM, Matney C, editors. History and Current Status of Psychedelics and Entactogens for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders. In: Exploring Psychedelics and Entactogens as Treatments for Psychiatric Disorders: Proceedings of a Workshop. National Academies Press, Washington DC; 2022. NBK587225.
Workshop proceedings record what participants said; they are not a consensus statement of the National Academies.
Peer-reviewed review covering the isolation, synthesis, pharmacology and ritual use of peyote and mescaline.
Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Pereira CL, da Silva DD. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Aspects of Peyote and Mescaline: Clinical and Forensic Repercussions. Current Molecular Pharmacology 12(3):184–194; 2019. doi:10.2174/1874467211666181010154139.
Institutional archives
- Heffter Research Institute Funds and coordinates clinical research on psilocybin, and keeps records of the studies it has supported since 1993. Sponsors the research it archives.
- Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) Sponsors clinical research, chiefly on MDMA-assisted therapy, and publishes an archive of historical and contemporary documents. A sponsor and an advocacy organization, not a disinterested archive; its clinical programme has a commercial arm.
The rest of this dossier
- Affinity — 120 measurements in this archive, equilibrium constants kept apart from functional readouts.
- Toxicology — nothing published for Rimonabant. An absent record is an absence of study, not evidence of safety.
- Legal — no DEA record is held here — which is not a finding that this compound is uncontrolled.
- Systems — where this compound’s targets are transcribed, by brain region and tissue.
Passages via PubChem descriptive sections, aggregating DrugBank, LiverTox, FDA, DEA, HSDB, EPA. Each is quoted whole and attributed to the database that published it. The only prose written here about Rimonabant is the history note, which says so on its face and carries a reference for every claim in it.
II · Identity
Structure and descriptors
Descriptors are computed here with RDKit from the structure PubChem returns — not from the archive's stored copy, so an edited local structure cannot reach this table.
- Formula
- C22H21Cl3N4OR
- Molecular weight
- 463.80g/molR
- Exact mass
- 462.0781DaR
- cLogP
- 5.94R
- TPSA
- 50.2ŲR
- H-bond donors
- 1R
- H-bond acceptors
- 4R
- Rotatable bonds
- 4R
- Aromatic rings
- 3R
- Heavy atoms
- 30R
- Fraction sp³
- 0.273R
- Formal charge
- 0R
Computed with RDKit 2025.09.2 from the SMILES returned by PubChem. Audit run 26/09/2026.
III · Behavior
Behavioral summary
Class, mechanism, and the duration of acute effects — each quoted from the record or trial that publishes it. Duration of effects and plasma half-life are shown separately, because they are different quantities and diverge by a factor of three or four.
Classification
Duration of acute subjective effects
—
No controlled human trial reporting a duration for this compound is cited here. The archive holds no other record of one either. A duration is not inferred from a chemical relative.
Plasma elimination half-life
How fast the body clears the drug — not how long the effects last. The two diverge sharply: LSD is cleared with a half-life of about 2.6 h while its subjective effects run 8–12 h.
6 to 9 days with normal BMI and 16 days if BMI is greater than 30
DrugBank
Primary pharmacological drivers
Mechanism, as published
Quoted verbatim from the database named after each passage, never summarized.
Rimonabant is a specific CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist. There is considerable evidence that the endocannabinoid (endogenous cannabinoid) system plays a significant role in appetitive drive and associated behaviours. It is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that the attenuation of the activity of this system would have therapeutic b…
DrugBank In the RIO-North America trial, 3040 patients were randomized to receive either placebo or one of two doses of rimonabant (5 mg or 20 mg per day). Patients taking 20 mg rimonabant had significant weigh loss, decrease in waist circumference, improved insulin sensitivity, and increases in HDL cholesterol, compared to patients on placebo.
DrugBank
IV · Clinical
Clinical description
Where this compound's substance class sits in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR, and how much of the recorded literature speaks to each domain of a mental status examination.
No diagnostic chapter is shown for this compound. Either PubChem records no MeSH pharmacological class for it, or the class it records is not one of the substance classes ICD-11 gives a chapter to. Inferring a chapter from the compound’s name or its binding profile would be a diagnosis this archive is in no position to make.
How much has been written about each domain
The clinical domains, and how many of the records this archive holds for this compound say something under each. What the terms mean, and the word list behind every spoke, are set out in the method.
None of the 3 records this archive holds for this compound uses a term from any of the clinical domains. That is a statement about the literature recorded here, not about the compound.
V · Systems
Systems physiology
Where the targets this compound binds are transcribed — brain regions on the left, peripheral and autonomic tissues on the right. A join of two measurements, not a claim about what the compound does to either.
Brain
basal ganglia: drawn as the caudate nucleus, putamen and globus pallidus.
Measured but not drawn — this anatomogram has no outline for them: pituitary gland 41.5, midbrain 6.7, retina 5.3, spinal cord 4.0.
Body
Square-root ramp · shared scale across both plates
Shading is transcript level — not affinity, and not affinity combined with expression. Outlined but unshaded organs hold none of this compound’s resolved targets above the atlas’s detection threshold. Anatomy from EMBL-EBI Anatomogram (Apache License 2.0); regions identified by Uberon (uberon.org), CC BY 3.0.
Brain regions
Regions where this compound's measured targets are transcribed. Linked from the plate above.
pituitary gland
41.5 nTPMcerebellum
32.4 nTPMcerebral cortex
18.6 nTPMbasal ganglia
15.1 nTPMhypothalamus
14.4 nTPMamygdala
13.3 nTPMhippocampal formation
13.2 nTPMmidbrain
6.7 nTPMretina
5.3 nTPMspinal cord
4.0 nTPM
Peripheral & autonomic
Tissues outside the CNS expressing the same targets — where a compound's bodily effects become possible.
colon
36.0 nTPMheart muscle
28.4 nTPMurinary bladder
13.4 nTPMstomach 1
10.6 nTPMspleen
8.4 nTPMsmall intestine
8.1 nTPMsmooth muscle
7.0 nTPMadrenal gland
4.6 nTPMthyroid gland
3.9 nTPMpancreas
3.2 nTPMlung
2.8 nTPMduodenum
2.4 nTPMskeletal muscle
1.8 nTPMsalivary gland
1.8 nTPMkidney
1.1 nTPMliver
0.2 nTPM
Each row joins two published measurements and nothing else: the affinity this archive holds for the compound at that target, and the transcript level the Human Protein Atlas reports for that target’s gene in that region. Bars scale with expression only. Expression is not activation — a receptor transcribed in a region is a receptor available to be bound there, which is a weaker and more defensible claim than saying the region is affected.
2 of this compound’s targets could not be resolved to a gene and are absent from both columns: Cannabinoid receptor, Sigma 1.
Expression data from Human Protein Atlas (CC BY-SA 3.0), RNA expression, nTPM (normalized transcripts per million), consensus tissue dataset. Uhlén M, et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419.
VI · Profile
Affinity rosette
The strongest measurement at each of 6 molecular targets. Cell-line and whole-organism screens are excluded here — they carry no affinity — and appear in the table below.
VII · Toxicology
Toxicological profile
What has been measured, and what has been published — kept apart, and neither scored. There is no risk rating on this page; the archive once carried one, identical for every compound, produced by a stub.
Measured in this archive
Assays that bear on toxicity, drawn from the same ChEMBL records as everything else on this page. They are measurements of what a compound binds or does to cells — not verdicts about what it does to a person.
hERG / cardiac ion channel 1
Block of the hERG potassium channel (KCNH2) is the standard in-vitro flag for QT prolongation. A measured affinity is not an arrhythmia risk, and this archive does not convert one into the other.
- hERGIC504,800nMCHEMBL1227232
Published toxicology
— None. The toxicology databases this site reads — HSDB, RTECS and LiverTox, by way of PubChem — hold no record for Rimonabant. They index compounds that have been studied for decades, so most of this archive has no entry. An absent record is an absence of study, not evidence of safety.
Published passages via PubChem toxicology sections, aggregating Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB), RTECS, LiverTox. No figure on this page is scored, ranked or combined into a risk level.
VIII · Evidence
Every measurement
One row per published value. The identifier in the last column resolves to the ChEMBL assay record it was read from.
Equilibrium binding constants 93
Ki and Kd — a concentration at equilibrium. Directly comparable across rows at the same target.
| Target | Class | Type | Value (nM) | pX | Organism | Assay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 0.190 | 9.72 | HUMAN | PMID 19102698 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 0.400 | 9.40 | HUMAN | PMID 1775 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 0.740 | 9.13 | HUMAN | PMID 20047779 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 0.900 | 9.05 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL1042698 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 0.900 | 9.05 | HUMAN | PMID 19102698 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.10 | 8.96 | HUMAN | PMID 17383180 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.18 | 8.93 | HUMAN | PMID 18512901 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.18 | 8.93 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL658893 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.30 | 8.89 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL659698 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.38 | 8.86 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1111398 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.38 | 8.86 | UNDEFINED | PMID 19767206 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.40 | 8.85 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1767553 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.50 | 8.82 | Mus musculus | CHEMBL2343203 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.60 | 8.80 | HUMAN | PMID 19351113 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.60 | 8.80 | HUMAN | PMID 19683918 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.80 | 8.74 | UNDEFINED | PMID 19351113 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.80 | 8.74 | HUMAN | PMID 18083560 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.80 | 8.74 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL658896 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.80 | 8.74 | Mus musculus | CHEMBL3857711 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.80 | 8.74 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL983966 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.90 | 8.72 | HUMAN | PMID 19520572 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.98 | 8.70 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL936658 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.98 | 8.70 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL3124129 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.98 | 8.70 | UNDEFINED | PMID 18363352 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1.98 | 8.70 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL981471 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 2.00 | 8.70 | HUMAN | PMID 22085649 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 2.40 | 8.62 | HUMAN | PMID 18363352 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 2.40 | 8.62 | HUMAN | PMID 20018510 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 2.40 | 8.62 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1070892 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 2.82 | 8.55 | Mus musculus | CHEMBL3857709 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 4.50 | 8.35 | Mus musculus | CHEMBL5366617 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 5.37 | 8.27 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL854385 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 5.60 | 8.25 | HUMAN | PMID 19095444 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 5.60 | 8.25 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1034817 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 6.00 | 8.22 | HUMAN | PMID 18335976 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 6.00 | 8.22 | HUMAN | PMID 22085649 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 6.18 | 8.21 | HUMAN | PMID 18512901 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 6.18 | 8.21 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL658892 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 6.50 | 8.19 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL961196 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 7.00 | 8.15 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5048445 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 7.30 | 8.14 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL2027598 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 7.30 | 8.14 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL2353263 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 8.00 | 8.10 | HUMAN | PMID 18579386 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 8.90 | 8.05 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL657906 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 9.80 | 8.01 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5321837 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 10.60 | 7.97 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL2329722 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 11.50 | 7.94 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL658897 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 12.00 | 7.92 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL873196 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 12.00 | 7.92 | HUMAN | PMID 18293908 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 12.00 | 7.92 | HUMAN | PMID 19595596 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 12.00 | 7.92 | HUMAN | PMID 18680276 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 16.00 | 7.80 | HUMAN | PMID 17942307 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 18.00 | 7.74 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL5256688 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 20.00 | 7.70 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5048447 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 25.00 | 7.60 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5510359 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 25.00 | 7.60 | HUMAN | PMID 20363132 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 25.00 | 7.60 | HUMAN | PMID 15771428 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 25.00 | 7.60 | HUMAN | PMID 18342403 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 40.00 | 7.40 | HUMAN | PMID 18511157 |
| Cannabinoid receptor | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 43.00 | 7.37 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL4360722 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 47.00 | 7.33 | HUMAN | PMID 17979261 |
| KOR | Opioid receptors | Ki | 57.00 | 7.24 | RAT | PDSP |
| Unchecked | Unclassified | Ki | 65.83 | 7.18 | — organism not recorded | CHEMBL1636583 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 126 | 6.90 | HUMAN | PMID 20047779 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 313 | 6.50 | HUMAN | PMID 18512901 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 313 | 6.50 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL659747 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 375 | 6.43 | Mus musculus | CHEMBL2343202 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 398 | 6.40 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1670561 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 514 | 6.29 | Mus musculus | CHEMBL3857712 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 554 | 6.26 | HUMAN | PMID 18083560 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 560 | 6.25 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1070893 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 560 | 6.25 | HUMAN | PMID 18363352 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 560 | 6.25 | HUMAN | PMID 20018510 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 697 | 6.16 | HUMAN | PMID 1775 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 702 | 6.15 | HUMAN | PMID 22085649 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 790 | 6.10 | HUMAN | PMID 18293908 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 790 | 6.10 | HUMAN | PMID 18680276 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 790 | 6.10 | HUMAN | PMID 18579386 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 790 | 6.10 | HUMAN | PMID 19595596 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 927 | 6.03 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1767554 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 927 | 6.03 | UNDEFINED | PMID 19767206 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 927 | 6.03 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1111399 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,000 | 6.00 | UNDEFINED | PMID 18363352 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,000 | 6.00 | HUMAN | PMID 19520572 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,569 | 5.80 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL983967 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,569 | 5.80 | UNDEFINED | PMID 19351113 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,580 | 5.80 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5510360 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,580 | 5.80 | HUMAN | PMID 20363132 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,580 | 5.80 | HUMAN | PMID 18342403 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,580 | 5.80 | HUMAN | PMID 15771428 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,640 | 5.79 | HUMAN | PMID 17942307 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | Ki | 1,990 | 5.70 | HUMAN | PMID 17979261 |
| Sigma 1 | Sigma receptors | Ki | 4,350 | 5.36 | RAT | PDSP |
Functional readouts 27
IC₅₀, EC₅₀, AC₅₀ and potency. Assay-dependent, and not interchangeable with a binding constant.
| Target | Class | Type | Value (nM) | pX | Organism | Assay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | EC50 | 0.170 | 9.77 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL966862 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 1.50 | 8.82 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5357863 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 1.90 | 8.72 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL988123 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 2.50 | 8.60 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL1212387 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 3.20 | 8.49 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5357864 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 4.50 | 8.35 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL950210 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 4.50 | 8.35 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5357862 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 4.53 | 8.34 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL1227203 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 4.53 | 8.34 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL1074127 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 4.53 | 8.34 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL940410 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 5.00 | 8.30 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL983945 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 5.00 | 8.30 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL957519 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 5.00 | 8.30 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL1038201 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 5.00 | 8.30 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL963901 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 5.00 | 8.30 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL1060016 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 5.20 | 8.28 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL981471 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 6.20 | 8.21 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL827163 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 13.50 | 7.87 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5153410 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 18.00 | 7.74 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL1816969 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 25.00 | 7.60 | Mus musculus | CHEMBL5366620 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 60.00 | 7.22 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL5341191 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 63.10 | 7.20 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL5341191 |
| CB2 | Cannabinoid receptors | IC50 | 2,600 | 5.59 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL5357865 |
| CB1 | Cannabinoid receptors | EC50 | 3,086 | 5.51 | Rattus norvegicus | CHEMBL5256689 |
| hERG | Ion channels | IC50 | 4,800 | 5.32 | Homo sapiens | CHEMBL1227232 |
| Unchecked | Unclassified | Potency | 14,125 | 4.85 | — organism not recorded | CHEMBL3214913 |
| Unchecked | Unclassified | Potency | 15,849 | 4.80 | — organism not recorded | CHEMBL3215169 |
- P
- PubChem
- C
- ChEMBL
- R
- Computed here with RDKit
- D
- Derived here from the stored measurement
IX · Trials
Registered clinical trials
Studies filed with ClinicalTrials.gov that name this compound as an intervention. A registered trial is a protocol, not a result — status and enrollment are printed beside every row, and withdrawn studies are counted rather than hidden.
47T
Registered studies
1T
Open or ongoing
47T
With a phase recorded
By phase
A study may carry two phase codes at once, so these count studies bearing each phase and do not sum to the total.
- Phase 14
- Phase 27
- Phase 335
- Phase 42
- Not applicable1
By status
The registry’s own status for each record. Withdrawn and terminated studies are counted here rather than hidden — a stopped trial is part of what is known.
- Completed25
- Terminated18
- Unknown status2
- Active, not recruiting1
- Withdrawn1
The 25 most recently started, of 47
Newest first by start date. Each identifier opens the registry record it came from; the title is the sponsor’s own, quoted.
- NCT07843108Active, not recruiting · Phase 1 / Phase 2
Effect of Rimonabant on Hand Function in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
- Enrollment
- 8Testimated
- Started
- 2026-05-13
- Sponsor
- Sinfatin S.L
Conditions Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT05622994Unknown status · Phase 2
Effects of CB1 Antagonist/Reverse Agonist Rimonabant on Walking Abilities in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- Enrollment
- 80Testimated
- Started
- 2022-11
- Sponsor
- Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de Toledo
Conditions Spinal Cord Injuries
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT05398913Completed · Phase 1 / Phase 2
Effects of Rimonabant on Walking Abilities in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- Enrollment
- 8Tactual
- Started
- 2021-05-12
- Sponsor
- Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de Toledo
Conditions Spinal Cord Injuries
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00754689Withdrawn · Phase 3
Study of Rimonabant/Metformin Combinations to Investigate Diabetes (Blood Sugar) Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
- Enrollment
- 0Tactual
- Started
- 2008-09
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00750347Completed · Phase 1
Antagonistic Interaction CB1-paracetamol
- Enrollment
- 24Testimated
- Started
- 2008-09
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Conditions Pain
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant and Paracetamol and placebo”
- NCT00690456Terminated · Phase 3
Effect of Rimonabant and Metformin Combination on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
- Enrollment
- 403Tactual
- Started
- 2008-05
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00656487Completed · Phase 2
Clinical and Neurobiological Effects of Cannabis Dependence in Young Adults
- Enrollment
- 66Tactual
- Started
- 2008-04-30
- Sponsor
- The Scripps Research Institute
Conditions Cannabis Dependence · Cannabis Withdrawal
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “rimonabant”
- NCT00678483Terminated · Phase 3
Long-Term Effect of 10 mg Versus 20 mg Rimonabant in Overweight or Obese Patients
- Enrollment
- 331Tactual
- Started
- 2008-04
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity · Weight Loss
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “rimonabant (SR141716)”
- NCT00734123Unknown status · Phase 4
Early Detection of Atherosclerosis: a Randomized Trial in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases.
- Enrollment
- 2948Testimated
- Started
- 2008-04
- Sponsor
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
Conditions Atherosclerosis · Cardiovascular Diseases
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00577148Terminated · Phase 3
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Rimonabant for Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
- Enrollment
- 89Tactual
- Started
- 2008-02
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Fatty Liver
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00576667Terminated · Phase 3
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Rimonabant for Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in Patients Without Diabetes
- Enrollment
- 165Tactual
- Started
- 2008-01
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Fatty Liver
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00547118Terminated · Phase 2
The Effects of Rimonabant, on Weight and Metabolic Risk Factors
- Enrollment
- 17Tactual
- Started
- 2007-11
- Sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
Conditions Schizophrenia · Schizoaffective Disorder · Obesity · Hypertension · Smoking
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00546325Completed · Phase 3
REASSURE: The Effect of Rimonabant on HbA1c in Overweight or Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequately Controlled on 2 Oral Antidiabetic Agents
- Enrollment
- 358Tactual
- Started
- 2007-10
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00603109Terminated · Phase 3
Effect of Rimonabant on Weight Gain and Body Composition in Adults With Prader Willi Syndrome
- Enrollment
- 10Tactual
- Started
- 2007-08
- Sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Conditions Prader-willi Syndrome
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “rimonabant”
- NCT00584389Terminated · Phase 4
The Effect of Rimonabant on Energy Expenditure, Fat Metabolism and Body Composition
- Enrollment
- 14Tactual
- Started
- 2007-07
- Sponsor
- University of Surrey
Conditions Obesity
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “rimonabant”
- NCT00478972Terminated · Phase 3
Japanese Study With Rimonabant in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Diet and Exercise
- Enrollment
- 321Tactual
- Started
- 2007-04
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity · Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00478595Terminated · Phase 3
Japanese Study With Rimonabant in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Oral Anti-diabetic Drug
- Enrollment
- 458Tactual
- Started
- 2007-04
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity · Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00458081Terminated · Phase 3
Evaluation of the Rimonabant Impact on the Regression of Asymptomatic Damage Caused by Cardiovascular Risk Factors
- Enrollment
- 174Tactual
- Started
- 2007-03
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity · Microalbuminuria · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 · Dyslipidemia
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00449605Terminated · Phase 3
A Glycemic Control Evaluation of Glimepiride Versus Rimonabant on Top of Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes
- Enrollment
- 508Tactual
- Started
- 2007-03
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00434096Terminated · Phase 3
Japanese Study of Rimonabant in Obese Patients With Dyslipidemia (VENUS)
- Enrollment
- 915Tactual
- Started
- 2007-02
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “rimonabant (SR141716)”
- NCT00412698Terminated · Phase 3
European Trial About Effect of RimoNabant on Abdominal Obese Patients With dysLipidemia
- Enrollment
- 645Tactual
- Started
- 2006-12
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity · Dyslipidemias
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “rimonabant”
- NCT00405808Terminated · Phase 3
Rimonabant in Abdominally Obese Patients With Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose
- Enrollment
- 2666Tactual
- Started
- 2006-12
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00408148Terminated · Phase 3
High Density Lipoprotein Turnover
- Enrollment
- 64Tactual
- Started
- 2006-10
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Obesity
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT00325650Terminated · Phase 3
Rimonabant In Prediabetic Subjects To Delay Onset Of Type 2 Diabetes
- Enrollment
- 2420Tactual
- Started
- 2006-05
- Sponsor
- Sanofi
Conditions Prediabetic State
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
- NCT01041170Completed · Phase 1
Antagonist-Elicited Cannabis Withdrawal
- Enrollment
- — no enrollment recorded in the registry entry
- Started
- 2006-04-16
- Sponsor
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Conditions Cannabis · Dependence
Matched “Rimonabant” in the study’s intervention “Rimonabant”
Records from ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. National Library of Medicine, NIH), API v2. A study is listed against a compound only when a verified name for that compound appears as a whole word in one of the study's own intervention names. A short code must appear as written, and a name the registry uses for something else (Aleph, a vaccine maker) is not matched. Title matches are not accepted. The matched name and the intervention text it matched are shown with every row.
Searched as Rimonabant · rimonabantum · Rimonabant free base. Run this search at the registry — it returns the unfiltered result, including studies this page rejected as belonging to a different molecule.
A registered trial is a protocol somebody filed with the registry. It is not a result, and nothing on this plate says whether Rimonabant worked.
X · Legal
Controlled-substance status
United States federal scheduling, read from the DEA records this archive holds. Not legal advice, and an absent record is not a finding that a compound is uncontrolled.
An absent DEA record is not a finding that Rimonabant is legal. It means this archive holds no DEA passage for it. The Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act reaches substances that appear on no schedule by name, and many compounds here are ring-substituted analogues of scheduled drugs. Nothing on this plate should be read as saying a compound may lawfully be made, held or supplied.
United States federal status only. State law differs, and so does the law of every other country — none of it is represented here. Scheduling changes, and this reflects the DEA records held by PubChem descriptive sections when the monograph was last harvested, not necessarily today. This is a record of what a database publishes, not legal advice.
XI · Literature
Sources behind this dossier
The papers this compound's values were read from, ranked by what each contributed. Not a review of the field.
Every paper below is one some value on this page came from — a binding constant, a passage of pharmacology or toxicology, or a measured duration. Each entry says what this archive took from it. Nothing else is claimed about any of them: the title is the study’s own account of itself, and a summary written here would be an assertion with no source behind it.
- 01
Wang H, Duffy RA, Boykow GC et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2008
- · 4 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.70 pX
- 02
Wiley JL, Selley DE, Wang P et al. · The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 2012
- · 3 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.70 pX
- 03
Dow RL, Carpino PA, Hadcock JR et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2009
- · 3 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.80 pX
- 04
Zhang Y, Burgess JP, Brackeen M et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2008
- · 3 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.93 pX
- 05
Diaryl piperidines as CB1 receptor antagonists
Scott JD, Li SW, Wang H et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2010
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.62 pX
- 06
Meng T, Wang J, Peng H et al. · European journal of medicinal chemistry 2010
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 9.13 pX
- 07
Lange JH, van der Neut MA, Borst AJ et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2010
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.60 pX
- 08
Discovery and functional evaluation of diverse novel human CB(1) receptor ligands
Foloppe N, Benwell K, Brooks TD et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2009
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.72 pX
- 09
Griffith DA, Hadcock JR, Black SC et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2009
- · 2 measurements at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 9.72 pX
- 10
Donohue SR, Varnäs K, Jia Z et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2009
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.86 pX
- 11
Silvestri R, Ligresti A, La Regina G et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 2009
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.92 pX
- 12
Discovery of a novel class of selective human CB1 inverse agonists
Foloppe N, Allen NH, Bentley CH et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2008
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.74 pX
- 13
Pasquini S, Botta L, Semeraro T et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2008
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.92 pX
- 14
Novel sterically hindered cannabinoid CB1 receptor ligands
Urbani P, Cascio MG, Ramunno A et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 2008
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.10 pX
- 15
Menozzi G, Fossa P, Cichero E et al. · European journal of medicinal chemistry 2008
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.60 pX
- 16
Silvestri R, Cascio MG, La Regina G et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2008
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.92 pX
- 17
Srivastava BK, Joharapurkar A, Raval S et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2007
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.33 pX
- 18
New 1,8-naphthyridine and quinoline derivatives as CB2 selective agonists
Manera C, Cascio MG, Benetti V et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2007
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.80 pX
- 19
Lange JH, van Stuivenberg HH, Coolen HK et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2005
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.60 pX
- 20
Rey L · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 1975
- · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB1 at 9.40 pX
- 21
1,2,3-Triazole derivatives as new cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists
Hou DR, Alam S, Kuan TC et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2009
- · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.25 pX
- 22
Fan H, Kotsikorou E, Hoffman AF et al. · European journal of medicinal chemistry 2009
- · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 7.40 pX
- 23
Dow RL, Hadcock JR, Scott DO et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2009
- · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.80 pX
- 24
Benzodioxoles: novel cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonists for the treatment of obesity
Alig L, Alsenz J, Andjelkovic M et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2008
- · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.22 pX
- 25
Smith RA, Fathi Z, Achebe F et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2007
- · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.96 pX