Skip to content
Plate 362 of 545Verified

HU-210

PubChem records this structure as HU 210.

Also known asA1H66

(6aR,10aR)-9-(hydroxymethyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydrobenzo[c]chromen-1-ol

PubChem CID
9821569
Measurements
11
InChIKey
SSQJFGMEZBFMNV-WOJBJXKFSA-N

I · Summary

What is known

Published passages, each quoted whole and attributed to the database that published it. Two blocks are written here rather than quoted, and both say so where they stand: the synthesized summary at the top, which may draw only on the passages beneath it, and the history note, which cites the works it came from. Every claim in either carries a marker to its source.

— No descriptive record. PubChem holds no attributed passage about HU-210 under any heading this site reads, and ChEMBL curates no mechanism for it. That is the common case for the research chemicals in this archive: they have structures and binding measurements, and nobody has written a monograph. The measurements are still on the plates that follow.

History, discovery and cultural use

— Not in this archive. PubChem, ChEMBL and the Human Protein Atlas publish pharmacology, regulation and toxicology, and none of them publishes a heading for when HU-210 was first made, by whom, or how it has been used. That is a gap in the databases this site reads and not a gap in the literature — the history of these compounds is written, at length and under peer review, in the works below. This site does not summarize them; it says where they are. Where a published passage above happens to touch origin or traditional use, it appears inside the entry that carries it.

Histories of this field

Scholarship on psychedelics generally, not on HU-210 specifically. Whether any of these treats this compound is a question for the book, not for this page.

  • Mescaline: A Global History of the First Psychedelic

    Traces mescaline and the peyote and San Pedro cacti from pre-Columbian ritual use through nineteenth-century chemistry to twentieth-century psychiatry and the counterculture.

    Jay M. Mescaline: A Global History of the First Psychedelic. Yale University Press, New Haven and London; 2019. ISBN 9780300231076.

  • Expanding Mindscapes: A Global History of Psychedelicsopen access

    Essays on the international and cross-cultural history of psychedelic science, deliberately decentring the standard North American and European account.

    Dyck E, Elcock C, editors. Expanding Mindscapes: A Global History of Psychedelics. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA; 2023. ISBN 9780262546935 (paper), 9780262376891 (open access). doi:10.7551/mitpress/14417.001.0001.

  • Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing, and Hallucinogenic Powers

    Botany, ethnography and chemistry of the principal hallucinogenic plants, by the founder of modern ethnobotany and the chemist who first synthesized LSD.

    Schultes RE, Hofmann A, Rätsch C. Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing, and Hallucinogenic Powers. 2nd ed. Healing Arts Press, Rochester VT; 2001. ISBN 9780892819799.

  • Psychonauts: Drugs and the Making of the Modern Mind

    The tradition of scientific self-experimentation with psychoactive drugs, and its part in the emergence of psychology and of modernism.

    Jay M. Psychonauts: Drugs and the Making of the Modern Mind. Yale University Press, New Haven; 2023. ISBN 9780300257946.

  • Ancient Psychoactive Substances

    Archaeological and bioarchaeological evidence for psychoactive plant use across the ancient world.

    Fitzpatrick SM, editor. Ancient Psychoactive Substances. University Press of Florida, Gainesville; 2018. ISBN 9780813056708.

  • History and Current Status of Psychedelics and Entactogens for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders

    A chapter tracing psychedelic and entactogen research from earlier ritual use through the mid-century research period to current clinical trials.

    Stroud C, Posey Norris SM, Matney C, editors. History and Current Status of Psychedelics and Entactogens for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders. In: Exploring Psychedelics and Entactogens as Treatments for Psychiatric Disorders: Proceedings of a Workshop. National Academies Press, Washington DC; 2022. NBK587225.

    Workshop proceedings record what participants said; they are not a consensus statement of the National Academies.

  • Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Aspects of Peyote and Mescaline: Clinical and Forensic Repercussions

    Peer-reviewed review covering the isolation, synthesis, pharmacology and ritual use of peyote and mescaline.

    Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Pereira CL, da Silva DD. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Aspects of Peyote and Mescaline: Clinical and Forensic Repercussions. Current Molecular Pharmacology 12(3):184–194; 2019. doi:10.2174/1874467211666181010154139.

Institutional archives

  • Heffter Research Institute Funds and coordinates clinical research on psilocybin, and keeps records of the studies it has supported since 1993. Sponsors the research it archives.
  • Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) Sponsors clinical research, chiefly on MDMA-assisted therapy, and publishes an archive of historical and contemporary documents. A sponsor and an advocacy organization, not a disinterested archive; its clinical programme has a commercial arm.

The rest of this dossier

  • Affinity — 11 measurements in this archive, equilibrium constants kept apart from functional readouts.
  • Toxicology — nothing published for HU-210. An absent record is an absence of study, not evidence of safety.
  • Systems — where this compound’s targets are transcribed, by brain region and tissue.

Passages via PubChem descriptive sections, aggregating DrugBank, LiverTox, FDA, DEA, HSDB, EPA. Each is quoted whole and attributed to the database that published it. The only prose written here about HU-210 is the history note, which says so on its face and carries a reference for every claim in it.

II · Identity

Structure and descriptors

Descriptors are computed here with RDKit from the structure PubChem returns — not from the archive's stored copy, so an edited local structure cannot reach this table.

2D structural depiction of HU-210
Depiction served by PubChem for CID 9821569. Not redrawn here, so the picture and the identity come from the same record.
Formula
C25H38O3R
Molecular weight
386.58g/molR
Exact mass
386.2821DaR
cLogP
6.22R
TPSA
49.7ŲR
H-bond donors
2R
H-bond acceptors
3R
Rotatable bonds
7R
Aromatic rings
1R
Heavy atoms
28R
Fraction sp³
0.680R
Formal charge
0R

Computed with RDKit 2025.09.2 from the SMILES returned by PubChem. Audit run 26/09/2026.

Bemis–Murcko scaffold

C1=CC[C@H]2c3ccccc3OC[C@@H]2C1

Shared with Delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol. All families

III · Behavior

Behavioral summary

Class, mechanism, and the duration of acute effects — each quoted from the record or trial that publishes it. Duration of effects and plasma half-life are shown separately, because they are different quantities and diverge by a factor of three or four.

Classification

Duration of acute subjective effects

—

No controlled human trial reporting a duration for this compound is cited here. The archive holds no other record of one either. A duration is not inferred from a chemical relative.

Plasma elimination half-life

How fast the body clears the drug — not how long the effects last. The two diverge sharply: LSD is cleared with a half-life of about 2.6 h while its subjective effects run 8–12 h.

No half-life is published for this compound in the sources this site reads.

Primary pharmacological drivers

ChEMBL holds no curated mechanism-of-action record for this compound. The measured affinities below are the evidence this archive has for what it binds.

IV · Clinical

Clinical description

Where this compound's substance class sits in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR, and how much of the recorded literature speaks to each domain of a mental status examination.

No diagnostic chapter is shown for this compound. Either PubChem records no MeSH pharmacological class for it, or the class it records is not one of the substance classes ICD-11 gives a chapter to. Inferring a chapter from the compound’s name or its binding profile would be a diagnosis this archive is in no position to make.

How much has been written about each domain

The clinical domains, and how many of the records this archive holds for this compound say something under each. What the terms mean, and the word list behind every spoke, are set out in the method.

None of the 0 records this archive holds for this compound uses a term from any of the clinical domains. That is a statement about the literature recorded here, not about the compound.

V · Systems

Systems physiology

Where the targets this compound binds are transcribed — brain regions on the left, peripheral and autonomic tissues on the right. A join of two measurements, not a claim about what the compound does to either.

019 nTPM

Square-root ramp · shared scale across both plates

Shading is transcript level — not affinity, and not affinity combined with expression. Outlined but unshaded organs hold none of this compound’s resolved targets above the atlas’s detection threshold. Anatomy from EMBL-EBI Anatomogram (Apache License 2.0); regions identified by Uberon (uberon.org), CC BY 3.0.

Brain regions

Regions where this compound's measured targets are transcribed. Linked from the plate above.

  1. cerebral cortex

    18.6 nTPM
  2. cerebellum

    18.3 nTPM
  3. pituitary gland

    17.3 nTPM
  4. basal ganglia

    15.1 nTPM
  5. amygdala

    13.3 nTPM
  6. hippocampal formation

    13.2 nTPM
  7. hypothalamus

    9.0 nTPM
  8. midbrain

    2.1 nTPM
  9. spinal cord

    1.7 nTPM
  10. retina

    1.1 nTPM

Peripheral & autonomic

Tissues outside the CNS expressing the same targets — where a compound's bodily effects become possible.

  1. colon

    10.0 nTPM
  2. spleen

    8.4 nTPM
  3. small intestine

    8.1 nTPM
  4. adrenal gland

    4.6 nTPM
  5. thyroid gland

    3.9 nTPM
  6. stomach 1

    3.4 nTPM
  7. urinary bladder

    3.4 nTPM
  8. lung

    2.8 nTPM
  9. smooth muscle

    2.3 nTPM
  10. skeletal muscle

    1.8 nTPM
  11. salivary gland

    1.8 nTPM
  12. pancreas

    1.2 nTPM
  13. heart muscle

    0.8 nTPM
  14. duodenum

    0.6 nTPM
  15. kidney

    0.6 nTPM
  16. liver

    0.1 nTPM

Each row joins two published measurements and nothing else: the affinity this archive holds for the compound at that target, and the transcript level the Human Protein Atlas reports for that target’s gene in that region. Bars scale with expression only. Expression is not activation — a receptor transcribed in a region is a receptor available to be bound there, which is a weaker and more defensible claim than saying the region is affected.

1 of this compound’s targets could not be resolved to a gene and are absent from both columns: NMDA.

Expression data from Human Protein Atlas (CC BY-SA 3.0), RNA expression, nTPM (normalized transcripts per million), consensus tissue dataset. Uhlén M, et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419.

VI · Profile

Affinity rosette

The strongest measurement at each of 3 molecular targets. Cell-line and whole-organism screens are excluded here — they carry no affinity — and appear in the table below.

NMDA — IC50 5.00 pXCB2 — Ki 9.85 pXCB1 — Ki 9.74 pXNMDACB2CB1579
Fig. Radius is pX = −log₁₀(value in M), that is 9 − log₁₀(value in nM), computed from the normalized measurement. Hatched wedges are equilibrium binding constants (Ki, Kd); dashed outlines are functional readouts (IC₅₀, EC₅₀, AC₅₀, potency), which answer a different question and are not pooled with them. Rings mark whole pX units from 5 to 10, labeled every second ring in the gutter at the top. Where a target carries several measurements, the strongest is drawn.

VII · Toxicology

Toxicological profile

What has been measured, and what has been published — kept apart, and neither scored. There is no risk rating on this page; the archive once carried one, identical for every compound, produced by a stub.

Measured in this archive

Assays that bear on toxicity, drawn from the same ChEMBL records as everything else on this page. They are measurements of what a compound binds or does to cells — not verdicts about what it does to a person.

No hERG, cytochrome, cytotoxicity or transport measurement exists for HU-210 in this archive.

Published toxicology

— None. The toxicology databases this site reads — HSDB, RTECS and LiverTox, by way of PubChem — hold no record for HU-210. They index compounds that have been studied for decades, so most of this archive has no entry. An absent record is an absence of study, not evidence of safety.

Published passages via PubChem toxicology sections, aggregating Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB), RTECS, LiverTox. No figure on this page is scored, ranked or combined into a risk level.

VIII · Evidence

Every measurement

One row per published value. The identifier in the last column resolves to the ChEMBL assay record it was read from.

Equilibrium binding constants 10

Ki and Kd — a concentration at equilibrium. Directly comparable across rows at the same target.

TargetClassTypeValue (nM)pXOrganismAssay
CB2Cannabinoid receptorsKi0.1409.85HUMANPMID 12065738
CB2Cannabinoid receptorsKi0.1509.82HUMANPMID 17942307
CB1Cannabinoid receptorsKi0.1809.74HUMANPMID 17942307
CB1Cannabinoid receptorsKi0.4109.39HUMANPMID 12065738
CB1Cannabinoid receptorsKi0.7309.14RATPMID 11408610
CB1Cannabinoid receptorsKi1.508.82HUMANPMID 18511157
CB1Cannabinoid receptorsKi2.328.63Zebra FinchPMID 11259544
CB2Cannabinoid receptorsKi4.108.39HUMANPMID 16392793
CB2Cannabinoid receptorsKi7.308.14HUMANPMID 16392793
CB2Cannabinoid receptorsKi1506.82RATPMID 16279794

Functional readouts 1

IC₅₀, EC₅₀, AC₅₀ and potency. Assay-dependent, and not interchangeable with a binding constant.

TargetClassTypeValue (nM)pXOrganismAssay
NMDAGlutamate receptorsIC5010,0005.00Rattus norvegicusCHEMBL751628
P
PubChem
C
ChEMBL
R
Computed here with RDKit
D
Derived here from the stored measurement

IX · Trials

Registered clinical trials

Studies filed with ClinicalTrials.gov that name this compound as an intervention. A registered trial is a protocol, not a result — status and enrollment are printed beside every row, and withdrawn studies are counted rather than hidden.

— No registered study names HU-210 as an intervention. That is an absence of registered research, not evidence about the compound. Most of this archive has never been the subject of a registered trial.

Records from ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. National Library of Medicine, NIH), API v2. A study is listed against a compound only when a verified name for that compound appears as a whole word in one of the study's own intervention names. A short code must appear as written, and a name the registry uses for something else (Aleph, a vaccine maker) is not matched. Title matches are not accepted. The matched name and the intervention text it matched are shown with every row.

Searched as HU-210. Run this search at the registry.

A registered trial is a protocol somebody filed with the registry. It is not a result, and nothing on this plate says whether HU-210 worked.

XI · Literature

Sources behind this dossier

The papers this compound's values were read from, ranked by what each contributed. Not a review of the field.

Every paper below is one some value on this page came from — a binding constant, a passage of pharmacology or toxicology, or a measured duration. Each entry says what this archive took from it. Nothing else is claimed about any of them: the title is the study’s own account of itself, and a summary written here would be an assertion with no source behind it.

  1. 01

    New 1,8-naphthyridine and quinoline derivatives as CB2 selective agonists

    Manera C, Cascio MG, Benetti V et al. · Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2007

    • · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB2 at 9.82 pX

    PMID 17942307

  2. 02

    Novel 4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide derivatives as new CB2 cannabinoid receptors agonists: synthesis, pharmacological properties and molecular modeling

    Stern E, Muccioli GG, Millet R et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2006

    • · 2 measurements at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB2 at 8.39 pX

    PMID 16392793

  3. 03

    Characterization of the diarylether sulfonylester (-)-(R)-3-(2-hydroxymethylindanyl-4-oxy)phenyl-4,4,4-trifluoro-1-sulfonate (BAY 38-7271) as a potent cannabinoid receptor agonist with neuroprotective properties

    Mauler F, Mittendorf J, Horváth E et al. · The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 2002

    • · 2 measurements at 2 targets (Ki), strongest CB2 at 9.85 pX

    PMID 12065738

  4. 04

    Analogs of JHU75528, a PET ligand for imaging of cerebral cannabinoid receptors (CB1): development of ligands with optimized lipophilicity and binding affinity

    Fan H, Kotsikorou E, Hoffman AF et al. · European journal of medicinal chemistry 2009

    • · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.82 pX

    PMID 18511157

  5. 05

    Design, synthesis, and binding studies of new potent ligands of cannabinoid receptors

    Brizzi A, Brizzi V, Cascio MG et al. · Journal of medicinal chemistry 2005

    • · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB2 at 6.82 pX

    PMID 16279794

  6. 06

    Evidence for a new G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptor in mouse brain

    Breivogel CS, Griffin G, Di Marzo V et al. · Molecular pharmacology 2001

    • · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 9.14 pX

    PMID 11408610

  7. 07

    Zebra finch CB1 cannabinoid receptor: pharmacology and in vivo and in vitro effects of activation

    Soderstrom K, Johnson F · The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 2001

    • · 1 measurement at 1 target (Ki), strongest CB1 at 8.63 pX

    PMID 11259544